Last evening Stacey and I went to see the highly touted movie "An Education." It is a well-acted British film set in London and Oxford in 1961; the young (24) actress Carey Mulligan won rave notices for her portrayal of the under-age heroine, Jenny. The plot line is familiar: the movie is a busted fairy tale, in which the ordinary girl becomes a princess until the moment when her savior turns out to be a frog.
Nothing prepared us for the anti-Semitic line running through the movie. The charming cad — who turns out to be a con man, a parasite, a philanderer, a thief, and a pervert — is repeatedly identified as Jewish, gratuitously, for religion plays no part in the seduction narrative. Nothing requires that he be Jewish — except the perpetuation of a stereotype, the demonizing of "the other," for allegorical purposes. The characters who reflexively voice their anti-Semitic prejudices — the headmistress of Jenny's school, played by the redoubtable Emma Thompson, reminds the headstrong student that "the Jews killed our Lord" — are not repudiated but vindicated by the turn of events in the movie. I found this element of the film most chilling, a disturbing reminder of the "genteel" anti-Semitism that I remember from my own time in Britain, and I scratch my head wondering why the vast majority of the critics overlooked this point. David Edelstein, in New York magazine, was an exception: "The story's most obvious lesson is 'beware of Jews bearing flowers.'"
Here is an excerpt from Irina Bragin's excellent piece, "The Wandering Jew in An Education: the Anatomy of an Anti-Semitic Film." — DL
<<<
Jenny: “Oh, and by the way … David’s a Jew, a wandering Jew. So watch yourself.”
We were only 15 minutes into the film and this was the second
reference to the “Wandering Jew,” an age-old, European anti-Semitic
stereotype. The British coming-of-age film, “An Education,” had gotten
rave reviews, yet the more I watched, the more the character of David
Goldman resembled the parasitical Jew of “Der Ewige Juden” (“The
Eternal Jew”) — one of the infamous 1930s Nazi propaganda films I had
studied in Peter Loewenberg’s class at UCLA.
From the moment David starts following the teenage Jenny in his fancy
car, the pudgy, effete David Goldman (played by Peter Sarsgaard)
proclaims his ethnicity. (Jenny: “I’m not a Jew.” David: “No, I am. I
wasn’t … accusing you.”) Like the predatory creature characterized in
“Der Ewige Juden,” Goldman pretends to adopt the values of his host
culture in order to turn its treasures into his profit. He offers Jenny
“three five-pound notes” to drive her cello home safely out of the
rain; “I’m a music lover,” he tells her. Then he proceeds to corrupt
the innocent gentile girl (played by Carey Mulligan) with expensive
flowers, gifts, concerts, art auctions and trips to Oxford and Paris.
deflating property values and looting cultural treasures from displaced
widows. He moves blacks into white neighborhoods: “Shvartzes,” he tells
Jenny, “have to live somewhere; it’s not as if they can rent from their
own kind.” The only identifiable Jew in the film, he constantly uses
the collective “we” to justify his wickedness: “This is how we are,
Jenny,” Goldman editorializes. “We’re not clever like you, so we have
to be clever in other ways, because if we weren’t, there would be no
fun.” He uses the word “stats” for old ladies he victimizes. They “are
scared of colored people; so we move the coloreds in and the old ladies
out and I buy their flats cheap.” Along with his partner, Danny, David
barges into a house, military style, and speeds away with precious
relics. “We have to be clever with maps,” he tells Jenny. An ancient
map, he rationalizes, “shouldn’t spend its life on a wall…. We know how
to look after it…. We liberated it.”
>>>
Read the rest of Irina Bragin's piece here.